Blitzkrieg or Bewegungskrieg

translated by Birgitte Heuschekel



The story behind the Panzer

Background

The concept behind Panzers, as well as tanks altogether, should be found in World War I. The first tanks used prior to World War I were nothing but armoured cars (of which some were still in use during World War II), which were used as air defence.I

In 1915-02, Winston Churchill (by then First Lord of the Admiralty) witnessed an armoured Holt 75 tracked tractor in the role of an artillery tractor, together with other high-ranking officers. Previously, in 1914, Churchill had shown interest in such a vehicle. The demonstration was no success, but Churchill ignored the other spectators' views, and asked for the project to be developed further. The next experimental model was quite poor, and a third was therefore manufactured. This vehicle featured the rhomb-shaped sides. The British Army ordered 100 of these vehicles.II

Battle role

Battle support or individual vehicles?

There were some disagreements as to what role the tank should fulfil. Some believed that tanks should be used for them self, in concentrated attacksIII, whereas others believed they should act as infantry support in dispersed groups.IV

The first engagement of the tank was at Somme. Here, 40 British tanks attacked the German positins as infantry support. Even though they scared the Germans present at the battle, they did not manage to make the breakthrough that Haig was hoping for, and needed. This meant that the element of surprise was lost, just like J.F.C. Fuller had predictedV.

J.F.C. Fuller

The, at the time, most prominent person in the field of tanks was J.F.C. Fuller (by then Major). He envisaged tank, not as a slow weapon meant for infantry support, but as a fast assault weaponVI. This was because of his past as a member of a light infantry regiment, which above all had speed as an asset.

It was Fuller who suggested a minor tank attack at Cambrai, to attack the head quarters of Crown Prince Rupprecht of Bavaria's, following a quick withdrawal. Before this could be initiated, Douglas Haig had started his attack at Ypres. It was not until after this blood bath that Haig began listening to Fuller, and authorized the plan for Cambrai. The plan, which started with a large breakthrough, ended as a failure.VII

During the war, Fuller presented his 1919 plan, which incorporated tanks 3-4 times as fast as those in existence at the timeVIII, and which could attack targets up to 100 miles behind enemy line.

German tactics

Towards the end of the war, the central powers had a small number of tanks, ranging from small machine gun-carrying tanks to huge mobile fortresses. These tanks did not comprise the spine of German tactics; as the central powers did not possess the same resources as the Entete, they still had to rely on infantry.IX

This was done with the socalled Stoßdivisionen – attack divisions – which used light machine guns and morters, flame throwers, etc., to attack weak points in the enemy lines. These units comprised specially trained men who advanced with artillery and air support to take out enemy artillery.

Different perceptions of the outcome – success or failure?

One of the most decisive factors as regards the development of tanks after World War I was that the Entete and the central powers had very different impressions of the tanks. Where the Entete had experienced extreme losses (the British tank corps had just eight tanks left on November 5), the central powers were focusing on the large defeats they had suffered from the tanksX.

It was not surprising that the Entete would place less value on tanks in the time to come, whereas the central powers would be attempting to further develop what in their eyes would be the decisive weapon of the future.

Blitzkrieg

Heinz Guderian

Heinz Guderian is probably the most famous German strategist, and he was to have the most influence on the development of the concept of Blitzkrieg. During World War I he served with a telegraph battallion where he came to realize the importance of communications during warfare. He touched in on the cavalry as well, and later with the office for inspection of motorised transportation. Hence he had a solid understanding of the technical aspects as well as of the importance of motorisation.

He read, among other things, J.F.C. Fuller and Liddell Hart's books and watched the operations of the British forcesXI. From these experiences he developed, with General Werner von Blomberg and others, his own tactics.

He was to publish these in the book "Achtung! Panzer!" which quickly became accepted by Hitler and the OKW – the books were to be viewed as more important in Germany than Fuller and Hart's books ever were in Great Britain. The reason was probably that Guderian's theories worked very well with the theories from World War I.

Artillery - land or air?

It was quickly evident that with the new Blitzkrieg, artillery would not be able to keep up, regardless of whether it was horse drawn or motorised. A replacement had to be found. Dive bombers became this replacement. Dive bombers could attack with great precision (as opposed to the British carpet bombers). At first the Blitzkrieg concept met with opposition from the artillery officers, but as it became evident that the concept was an addition to – not a replacement for – conventional artillery, this opposition dissipated.

The Versailles treaty

The Versailles Treaty, which Germany was forced to sign to prevent occupation of her territories, dictated that Germany could have neither tanks nor an air force. Germany's armed forces could comprise only 100,000 men.

This was a setback for the production of planes and tanks both. Hitler had to wait quite some time before he could begin production, and even then some of the training of men had to take place in Russia which at the time was Germany's ally. Pz.Kpfw. I and Pz.Kpfw. II were dubbed "Groß Traktor" and "Leicher Traktor" – large and small tractor – to conceal their true nature.

Where the Luftwaffe, as essential to the Blitzkrieg as the Panzers, was concerned, aviation clubs were formed which were to train the pilots in air combat and offer important feedback to designers on the newest aviation theoriesXII. The civil war in Spain, where Germany's Kondor Legion fought for Franco, was important as well, as several problems of logistic nature were discovered at this time.

In the mid-thirties where production began, the Versailles Treaty had been pushed so much to the background that few were suspecting that Germany might truly be preparing for war.

The strategy of Blitzkrieg

The strategy of Blitzkrieg comprised a number of general phases. These have obviously varied from battle to battle, depending on which weapons were available, terrain, etc. Generally, however, the outlines were identical.

Phase 1 – preparations

The weak points of the enemy were determined. This was done through larger assaults during up to several months in advance. It was important to find the places on the enemy front line which would be easiest to penetrate.XIII

Particularly during larger battles it provied difficult to conceal the concentration of troops necessary to attack and penetrate enemy lines. A German infantry division comprised roughly 17,000 men, more than 4,000 horses and motorised vehicles, and hundreds of cannonsXIV, as well as a Panzer division of up to 3,000 vehiclesXV and 14,000 men. The infantry division as well as the Panzer division moved slowly and would block roads and railways entirely.XVI

As a campaign easily might comprise 20-30 infantry divisions and some 5-10 Panzer divisions, it was an incredible logistical challenge to, not only move the forces, but also to do this without the enemy gaining knowledge of it, or attacking.

Phase 2 – faked attack

As it was of outmost importance that the attack came as a total surprise to the enemy, it was often required to fake an attack elsewhere on the front line (typically where the enemy would be expecting an attack) in order to draw forces away from the real target. This was done with air and ground forces both.XVII

The air attacks did not merely comprise bomber attacks such as those conducted by Ju87 and Ju88 bomber planes, but also paratroopers and airborne attacks. The faked attacks could thus also fulfill a goal of their own such as conquering key points and fortifications which otherwise might hinder advancement later on.

Phase 3 – main assault

While enemy forces were occupied elsewhere the main forces were sent into battle. Whether a battle or a campaign would be succesful to a great extent depended on quick penetration now. As mentioned above, it all depended on finding the points on the enemy front which were most vulnerable.XVIII

The role of the Panzers

As seen earlier, the Panzer was the primary assault weapon.XIX Panzers were used to break through the enemy lines, but once they had penetrated the front it was up to the infantry to actually fight down the enemy positions. The Panzers would advance with great speed, together with motorised infantry. Whenever a strong point was encountered, the Panzers would go around it, leaving it to the infantry to deal with.

Some Panzers were used to take out enemy tanks, while others (particularly the Pz.Kpfw. IV, with its mortar-like cannon) was deployed as mobile armored artillery. These were used to take out pillboxes and other fortified strong points where the smaller infantry cannons and mortarsXX were not always sufficient.

The role of the infantry

In spite of the predominant ideas that Germany's army mainly comprised the Panzers and the Luftwaffe, infantry was still one of the most important groups of the army. The infantry divisions obviously also played an important role in the Blitzkrieg. It was the infantry which would establish bridgeheads at rivers, etc., on which the Panzers depended, and it was the infantry that attacked cities as to prevent great Panzer losses.XXI

In order to fulfill all these requirements, the German infantry was armed with many different kinds of military gadgets. Not only did they have artillery, light and heavy machine guns and anti-tank cannons; they also utilized flame throwers (particularly useful against buildings and pillboxes) and explosives. Particularly the engineers used such equipment. These were deployed to lead the advance after the Panzer wedges to keep the flanks safe, for which reason they were often equipped with armored personnel carriers.XXII

The role of the Luftwaffe

The Luftwaffe was a very important factor in the Blitzkrieg, if not as important as it has often been credited for. Its primary function was to operate as advanced artillery and at the same time defend against enemy planes. In spite of Germany's possessing several good anti-aircraft cannonsXXIII, any column of vehicles was still very vulnerable to airborne attack. The dive bombers were not only artillery – they also operated as weapons of terror, and the sound of the incoming planes aloneXXIV was often enough to cause panic amongst enemy forces.

In order to take full advantage of the dive bombers it was imperative to have control of the air. To ensure this, enemy air strips were attacked, primarily with fighter planes and fighter bombers.

The radio

The British were the first to install radio in their tanks. The Germans quickly followed suit and built an advanced radio systemXXV. Lesser unit commanders could not ignore orders, and the German commanders could concentrate on commanding their tank (as opposed to the French commanders). All German aircrafts had radios, as opposed to many French aircrafts.

Attack and defense

When conducting an attack with such great speed as Blitzkrieg required, there was a risk that the enemy forces might break through flanks or find a hole in German defenses. It was imperative to be able to fight down such an attack. This was done by having anti-tank cannons and infantry wait in positions along secondary roads so that they did not hold up the advance but were still able to strike with great speed. With these less important forces were also waiting recovery vehicles and army medic units.

Phase 4 – penetration and further attack

Once enemy lines were penetrated, the Panzers and motorised forces were to attack quickly through enemy territory to ascertain a total breakdown of defense as well as to create panic and uncertainty among enemy troops.XXVI

Another core principle was the encirclement of the enemy in large groups where they could be slowly but determinedly destroyed. This princip was known as "Kesselschlach".XXVII

Conclusion

The primary factors of using the Blitzkrieg method was to find and isolate enemy weak points the same way that the Stoß divisions had during World War I. The enemy would be fooled into thinking that the main assault would come elsewhere, whereafter enemy weak points were attacked with great numbers of Panzers supported by the Luftwaffe. Infantry was to follow and destroy the enemy, still with air support.

Once a bridgehead was established more troops were sent in to strengthen the hold and take the attack far into enemy territory. Here, they would secure essential points and spread panic among the population so that the main forces could advance relatively easy. Once Panzers and infantry had advanced a good bit into enemy territory, it was time to encircle and destroy the enemy.

The deployment of Blitzkrieg

In the following we will go over the battles of Poland in 1939 (Fall Weiß) and France in 1940 (Fall Gelb) compared to the phases described in thre previous chaptor.

Fall Weiß – Poland, 1939

Fall Weiß began on September 1. The background for the operation was part that Hitler wanted Poland to return territories which had been German before World War I to Germany. Particularly Danzig through which Poland had access to the sea was of interest to HitlerXXVIII. Most of all, however, Hitler was intent on showing his army off to the world community. He used his demands to Poland to return Danzig to Germany to initiate the Polish campaign and at the same time tried not to involve France and Great Britain, at the time allies of PolandXXIX. It was furthermore important to the German war industry that the Polish industrial regions were taken relatively undamaged.

It should be noted that Germany in 1939 did not possess the well-trained army that many credit it with. Some units had received battle experience in Spain, but the majority of the infantry was still unbloodedXXX. They were to receive enough battle experience in Poland and France, however, to be the best trained army in Europe, possibly in the world, when Barbarossa took off on June 22, 1941.

The Plan

Fall Weiß comprised five large attacks which were launched from Germany and East Prussia:

These units would create three geat pincher maneuvers which would serve to encircle the Polish army. It was planned that Russia was to attack Poland from behind which would ensure that Poland could not fall back and regroup and that the battle would not be drawn out.

Furthermore, several Gemans drove across the Polish border on August 31 under pretense of being tourists. These were to quickly take control of border controls so that there would be no resistance to the first advances.

Faked attack?

In essence there was no faked attack on Poland – nothing intended to lead the enemy to the wrong place. Some Polish politicians did believe it possible that Germany "only" intended to close the gap between Germany and East Prussia, and thus a large part of the Polish army was stationed thereXXXII.

Main attack – Kutno, Warzaw, and Brest-Litovsk

The assault more or less went according to plan for which reason there is no need to repeat the goals. Poland offered more resistance than expected in some places but the assault was at no time seriously threatened. The Germans did learn in Warzaw that their Panzers were very vulnerable which did lead to some losses.

Particularly the Luftwaffe played an important role as it could attack enemy points unhindered (after having annihilated the Polish air forces on the ground). 14. Armee made certain that no units could escape across the Vistula river which cut through Poland.

Contrary to plan, 10. Armee was ordered north to participate in the fighting in Warzaw. On the way they encircled a number of Polish units at Radom, slowing them down considerably. Parts of 8. Armee was re-routed to assist the 10. Armee.

The Poznan army which had been bypassed earlier sought to escape complete encirclement by attacking 8. ArmeeXXIII. The Poznan army did not make it out in time and the last units were encircled at Kutno. Guderian was permitted to drive his XIX Panzer Corps to Brest-Litovsk to, together with 3. Armee and 14. Armee, conquer the city. Guderian had a personal interest in this as his childhood home was close by.

Russia enters the war

Russia, which was supposed to assist Germany from the east, entered the war just as it appeared to be over. Russian accomplishments were thus limited but Russia did gain the part of Poland which had been agreed on earlier, including Brest-Litovsk which German forces had conqueredXXXIV.

The destruction of Poland's army

After the pockets had been closed on September 17, the Polish army was slowly destroyed or captured. In spite of Poland's brave fighting effort they could not hold out against Germany's superior technical power.

Some of the Polish forces did manage to escape to France through Romania and Ukraine. Later they were evacuated to England.

Great Britain and France's declarations of war

As Great Britain and France were allies of Poland, they were forced to declare war on Germany at the invasion of Poland. On September 3, Great Britain and then France declared war on Germany. Neither nation was to attack Germany which Poland and Germany both had expectedXXXV. Both nations had, however, greatly overestimated the Allied forces at the French eastern front at the timeXXXVI.

Blitzkrieg?

It can be argued whether Fall Weiß was an example of Blitzkrieg as described in chapter 3. Speed was an important factor as was the Luftwaffe. On the other hand, the Panzers did not play an important role and the play between attack and defense during the Polish attack on the 8. Armee did not happen. The best example of quick penetration with Panzers is Guderian's XIX Panzer Corps, but this was not part of the original plan. The Polish army was not struck with panic the way that the French would be the year after. The large encirclements did resemble the Kesselschlacht theory.

The battle was chiefly an infantry affair – a motorised infantry battle, but an infantry battle nonetheless. A display of raw power which Germany won. The number of German tanks in 1939 was still so small that no great number of tanks were deployed at all.

The weather

If the weather had been different the results in Poland could have been different as wellXXXVII. It was fortunate for the German forces that the weather was relatively dry when the attack took place – if not, the entire German war machine could have been bogged down in the mud just as was to happen in Russia a few years later.

Fall Gelb – France, 1940

Fall Gelb which was to begin on May 10 was not just the battle for France, but also for Belgium, Holland, and Luxembourg; Belgium and Holland were neutral at the time. France was viewed as undefeatable at the time, not just because its armies were considered the world's best but also because of the Maginot Line. This had been constructed in the light of Germany's succesful use of stationary defense compounds during World War IXXXVIII.

This defense perimeter did not protect France to the north which was the tactically most vulnerable regionXIL. For this reason France expected that an attack would come here, with the enemy going through Holland and Belgium. No one thought it possible to attack France through Luxembourg and the Ardennes Forest for which reason these areas were defended only by scattered second-rate divisionsXL.

The plan

At first the German plan resembled simply a repetition of World War I's plan for the attack on France, known as the Schleiffen planXLI.

The entire German army would attack across the entire front, from the middle of Holland to southern Luxembourg. Not a lot of people had confidence in this plan, not even the generals designing itXLII. General von Manstein, an at this time younger and less known general, reviewed the plan and realized that it would not succeed. He drew up his own plan to replace itXLIII. This was done on October 31, 1939. It took a while before the OKW agreed to show Hitler this new plan (three months), but once it happened, Hitler rejoiced.In all its simplicity, von Manstein's plan comprised Armeegruppe B faking an attack on Holland and Belgium. This would draw out BEF and the French army. Then Armeegruppe B would attack through the Ardennes and cut off BEF from the rest of France by a Panzer attack across France.

Here they would push the BEF up against the Canal whereafter they would be expected to surrender.

French tank tactics

France, as well as Great Britain, used very different tank tactics from Germany's. Where Germany deployed their Panzers in concentration, France and England deployed their tanks spread out among the infantry, allowing the tanks to operate as infantry support. This meant that it was easy for the German forces to take out the few tanks used at a time and the otherwise superior Allied tanks comprised no real threat towards Germany's superior Blitzkrieg tactics.

Faked attack – Holland and Belgium

As during the attack on Poland, Germany sent "tourists" across the borders to take border crossings etc. Paratroopers and airborne troops were deployed thus. The Belgian fortress Eben Email was attacked and conquered in just one day by airborne troopsXLIV as it overlooked one of the main attack lines. Rotterdam was attacked by paratroopers to control the Moerdijk bridge which would be used later. Later on, the 9. Panzer division and motorised infantry were sent in from the south towards Holland and Belgium, and several Panzer and infantry divisions were sent in from the north. These forces met only little resistance thanks t the previous attacks.

The German faked attack worked. The BEF and the French main forces moved north. Before they reached far they were, in spite of Belgium being under attack at the time being, stopped by the Belgian border guards. In essence, all noteworthy resistance had been removed from the main target.

Penetration – The Ardennes to Sedan

Armeegruppe A, with three large Panzer corps, attacked the French positions through the Ardennes. As in Poland the attack went more or less according to plan, for which reason I will not repeat it here either. The German forces advanced quickly towards the Meuse river which was predicted to be the greatest hindrance they would meet.

Panzer Corps Reinhard made it fairly safely across the Meuse at Montherme as planned. At Sedan, however, the Germans ran into trouble. The German forces had to cross the Meuse, and this had to take place at Sedan. This was because Sedan was considered to be a weak point as the dividing line between the French 55. infantry division and 71. infantry division ran through there. Furthermore, the terrain made it possible to cross only at three bridges. Other logistic problems also helped slow the advanceXLV.

Sedan

On May 9, Guderian began the bombardment of the pillboxes near Sedan with the Panzers and cannons available to him. The Luftwaffe assisted as well. The 55. infantry division saw the advancing German Panzers and called for artillery bombardment of them, however with reduced strengthXLVI.

With heavy casualties, German engineers made it across the Meuse and established a bridgehead. Particularly the infantry regiment Großdeutschland played an important part as they attacked with great strength in spite of heavy losses.

It was not until May 14 that Guderian saw his first Panzers across the MeuseXLVII. These in turn had to wait until a sufficient number of Panzers had crossed, for which reason the infantry was left to fight on its own.

While the French leaders were receiving word that the front was secured, Guderian chose to send his entire Panzer force west to make use of the success, rather than assist the infantry in defending the bridges against the French reserves.

French planes

Even if the Luftwaffe had destroyed several French and British fighter planes it turned out later that France could have scrambled planes against the German forces. There were hundreds of French planes which could have been used against the Germans. No less than 1,700 French planes in fighting conditions were discovered after the war. The reason turned out to be that French planes were removed from the danger zone – but as everything happened very quickly, no one knew where and how many. Because of this, an organised counter-attack was impossible.

Further attack – the road to Dunkirk

After Sedan, Guderian's Panzer forces saw little resistance. They advanced unhindered until suddenly attacked on both flanks. On May 17-19, de Gaulle attacked the 10. and 1. Panzer division in the attempt to halt the German advance. This was the only French attack in 1940 which bore any resemblance to Blitzkrieg whatsoever and where tanks were used in concentration. As the French forces were pitifully equipped, the attack was fought off. It was close to breaking through the German lines, however.

Lord Gort – commander of the BEF – attacked from the north on May 21 in the attempt to penetrate the German forces. The lacking communication between the BEF in the north and the French forces in the south created so much confusion, however, that the attempt failedXLVIII. The 6. Panzer division attacked the BEF's left flank and routed the attack. This caused Hitler to show more caution later in the battle.

If the attacks on May 17-19 and 21 occurred simultaneously it is quite likely that the German Panzer units had been cut off from the infantry which at the time had trouble keeping up. If this had happened, the Panzer units would have been destroyed and France could have mustered a counter-attack.

Hitler's "Halt" orders

Before Guderian's forces could reach the BEF and the French army, Hitler issued his famous "Halt" orders by which he stopped the entire Panzer force just outside Dunkirk. This allowed the BEF and a great part of the French army to escape. This is one of the most discussed decisions of World War II, and to describe it in detail would consume too much space.

In short, Hitler conferred with Hermann Göring and others, and then ordered Guderian's advance to stop, giving the Luftwaffe the honor of destroying the enemy forces. There are many suggestions as to why Hitler made this decision, including the theory that Hitler wished to leave the BEF and the French army intact in the light of future peace negotiations with Great BritainIL. On the other hand, Hitler was considering the conquest of EnglandL for which reason he probably would not wish to see its army escape.

The most logical explanation is that Hitler and the OKW simply did not understand that the enemy might escape across the Channel as Germany – unlike Great Britain – was not a seafaring nation to a great extentLI LII. As the British counterattack against Rommel had made Hitler more cautious he wanted to wait for the infantry to catch up. At Dunkirk, the Luftwaffe encountered real resistance for the first time for which reason their attack on the fleeing troops was less succesfull. As Dunkirk is geographically close to England, British fighter planes could attack across the Channel to attack the German bombers (which had no fighter protection) in France.

After Dunkirk

After Dunkirk, Germany concentrated on the rest of France. From the conquered part of France they pressed south. At the same time Spain attacked from the south and Italy from the west. On June 4, 1940, the Axis powers controlled roughly half of France. The rest of France capitulated and was placed under German control (known as Vichy France).

Later battles

Finally, a short note concerning later battles. The Blitzkrieg tactic was never forgotten by the Germans and it was attempted used on several later occasions. Particularly during Barbarossa, Blitzkrieg was utilized in 1941 and 1942. The Germans managed to capture millions of Russians in this way, but due to limited space, we will not discuss Barbarossa here.

Besides, a discussion of Barbarossa would not add much to the factors of the use of Blitzkrieg discussed above.

Blitzkrieg was attempted used later, but at this time the Allies were too strong and Germany too weak for the Allies to be defeated in this fashion. Blitzkrieg was used in lesser scale through-out the entire war, with varying degrees of success.

The importance of Blitzkrieg during the early war years

It is evident that if Germany had not used Blitzkrieg, World War II would have ended like the first – a gigantic, static excercise in trench warfare. An important factor was that Poland and France did not possess these tactics – if they had, Germany would quite likely have lost in France.

Another important factor in the early success of Germany was that the German generals were fast learners, as opposed to their Allied counterparts. Besides the fact that the Allies were slow to learn the principles behind the Blitzkrieg and the design of tanks, they also fell for the same tricks several times. As an example of this can be pointed to the Ardennes in 1944. Here, Germany attacked through the Ardennes Forest exactly like in 1940, and the Allies were equally taken on the bed. The quick recovery of the Allied forces defeated Germany this time, however.

The end of the war

It should be pointed out that the first, decisive victories in a way caused Germany to lose the war. Hitler and the OKW only saw the victories of the Panzers and in their victory rejoicing forgot the infantry. This was a decisive factor in Germany's defeat later on.

After the war

It should be noted as well that the concept of Blitzkrieg has had a profounder impact on warfare after than during World War II. Today, practically every army and larger militia has tanks and armored vehicles which are used the exact way that Blitzkrieg dictates – quick and precise attacks where it will hurt the enemy most.

Conclusion

Generally speaking, Germany would have been facing a far greater challenge in Poland, and a victory in France would have been out of the question. Hence, Blitzkrieg has had a great impact, not only on the war itself but also on the world community in the years after.

Conclusion

Blitzkrieg origins from World War I. It was built as a theory based on experiences had by Germans and British both. It was the British tanks and the German Stoß divisions which created the tactic of swift, armored vehicles supported by infantry and dive bombers.

In all its simplicity, the tactic comprised finding the enemy's weak points, a faked attack elsewhere, whereafter infantry and Panzers – with air and artillery support – would break through at the weakest points. Panzer forces would then penetrate into enemy territory and create panic and chaos, ascertaining a quick surrender by the enemy. If required, enemy forces would be surrounded and destroyed by the infantry following in the Panzers' tracks.

In Poland, 1939, and particularly in France, 1940, Blitzkrieg tactics were deployed. In Poland this happened through two large pincher maneuvers which stretched through half the country to conquer Kutno, Warzaw, and Brest-Litovsk. This deployment bore some resemblance to the Kesselschlacht theory as well, for which reason it may be argued that this campaign was not really Blitzkrieg.In France, Bock's Armeegruppe B attacked Holland and Belgium which attracted the BEF. Then von Rundstedt's Armeegruppe A attacked through the Ardennes, and Guderian's Panzers pressed on until reaching the coast in the attempt to catch up with the French army and the BEF.

Blitzkrieg came to wield a great influence, not only on World War II but also on the years thereafter. Without it, Hitler would probably never have made it through France, and Barbarossa would never have happened at all.Blitzkrieg tactics are still used today, in modified forms, as the primary used tactic in larger campaigns.

Notes

  1. It should be noted that motorised steam-driven artillery tractors were used as early as the 1850'es. These vehicles were, however, never meant for battle use.
  2. Since there were several opponents of this, they were described as "water tanks" - the name stuck
  3. "Colonel Swinton remained the most important protagonist of the tank. He saw it as a surprise weapon and was convinced that it could deal a swift and mortal blow to the Germans. But the higher commander disagreed. Sir Douglas Haig, Commander in Chief of the British Army in France, told the Tank Suppply Committee in August 1917, "[the] tank at any rate in its present state of developement, can only be regarded as a minor factor…an adjunct to infantry and guns..." For Lord Kitchener, Secretary of State for War, the tank was no more than a "pretty mechanical toy"" Deighton, 2000.
  4. "He [Douglas Haig] got rid of Swinton and replaced the tank unit commander with a man of his own choice. The tanks were not concenrtated; they were issued to infantry units, as support, over miles of front." Ibid.
  5. "It would reveal the secret weapon to the Germans with no chance of breakthrough". Ibid.
  6. "Speed, and still more speed, and always speed was the secret[...]" <http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/blitzkrieg.htm>.
  7. "[...] Fuller's ideas for a raid had been changed into a full-scale offensive, with unrealistic objectives and poor plannig for the follow-up. There were no reserves ready to hold the captured ground, and the cavalry, who had spent years clamoring for a chance to exploit a breakthough, were now not clever enough or quick enough to do so.
    The Germans rushed to close the gap in their defenses and the British victory turned sour." Deighton, 2000.
  8. The tanks at the time had a maximum speed of 13-14 km./h., whereas Fuller envisaged tanks which could drive up to 45 km./h.
  9. The central powers had a few minor battles where their tanks provided tactical victories.
  10. "The Germans [...] remembered the tanks that several times had brought the Allies close to victory." Deighton, 2000.
  11. "In the summer exercises of 1929 he [Guderian] used small cars rigged up to represent tanks. Little was accomplished beyond establishing a desire for real tanks. When Guderian was given the command of a motorized battalion, the need for make-believe continued; his men used motorcycles to supplement the antique armoured cars and wooden sticks to represent antitank weapons. But there were no substitute for real radio, and in 1931 the British Army again led the world by installing newly developed crystal-controlled radios to exercise 180 tanks under one command.
    It allworked perfectly – so perfectly that some observers suspected it was a hoax brought off by means of previously rehearsed drivers. Guderian knew better. He saw that radio command was now a primary requirement for the sort of warfare he envisaged." Ibid.
  12. "The Germans were "air-minded". Restricted by the terms of the Versailles peace treaty, they discovered that the glider provided lessons for both pilots and designers and more than 15.000 Germans earned certificates for gliding skill, far more than the rest of Europe combined. The aerodynamics of the glider left no doubt of the monoplane's superior qualities. For powered flights too, Germany persevered with monoplanes. In 1922, when 60 per cent of German aircraft types were monoplanes, they comprised only 6 per cent of Britain's aircraft types, 9 per cent of French aircraft types and 27 per cent of American aircraft types." Deighton, 1999.
  13. "The Schwerpunkt – place of main effort – was not the place where major resistance was encountered. On the contrary, the advance elements by-passed and avoided opposition, wriggling and infiltrating whereever possible, fighting only where there was no other alternative. The momentum of the attack was vital to success, and so no element would move off the roads to go cross-country without very good reason, for this would slow the advance." Deighton, 2000.
  14. "The division's three infantry (grenadier) regiments had a combined strength of 9,180 all ranks. In addition there was a reconnaissance battalion with 623 man, an artillery formation of 3,172 all ranks, a pioneer battalion with 779 all ranks, an anti-tank battalion with 708 man and a signals battalion with 476 men. The total strength of the division was 17,734 all ranks.
    In the divisional armoury there were 378 light machine guns, 138 heavy machine guns, 93 mortars of 5 cm calibre, and 54 of 8 cm. Of infantry guns, there were 20 light and 6 heavy. The artillery component was 75 PAK guns of 3.7 cm caliber, 36 10.5 cm caliber light field howitzers and 12 heavy field howitzers of 15 cm caliber.
    The wheeled strength of the division included 919 horse-drawn carts, 4,842 horses, 394 AFVs, 615 lorries and 527 motorcycles, 201 of which had sidecars." Lucas. These are the general guidelines for the composition, which was rarely fulfilled.
  15. Hereof 300 tanks. This number changed fromdivision to division, since the Panzer Divisionen rarely received their full compliment of tanks.
  16. "One armoured division transported by railway required no less than eight trains to move it, each train with up to fifty-five wagons. This gigantic movement occupied the full capacity of a railway for four whole days and nights.
    Moving an armoured division by road, however, was an even more conspecious exercise. How could a moving column of vehicles that occupied nearly 70 miles of road and crawled along at about 2.5 miles an hour be kept hiden? (Such is the textbook calculation for perfect weather in good terrain without enemy action of any kind.) It is easy to imagine the sensation in town and vilage as this endless parade moved through. And what of its vulnerability to air and reconnaissance and to bombers." Deighton, 2000.
  17. "Airforce attacks enemy front-line and rear positions, main roads, airfields and communication centers. At the same time infantry attacks on the entire frontline (or at least at main places) and engages enemy. This restrains the enemy from knowing where the main force will attack." <http://www.achtungpanzer.com/blitz.htm>.
  18. "Concentrated tank units breakthrough main lines of defense and advance deeper into enemy territory, while following mechanized units pursuit and engage defenders preventing them from establishing defensive postions. Infantry continues to engage enemy to misinform and keep enemy forces from withdrawing and establishing effective defense." Ibid.
  19. "...reinforcements were often unable to reach the front because the roads were jammed with refugees trying to escape from the war zone, neither the Luftwaffe nor the tank crews being slow to exploit terror as an additional weapon whose use might induce a speedier end to the fighting; from this time onwards panzer units engaged in offensive operations would open up with their weapons when driving through villages and woods, whether or not they were fired at themselves, not only as a precautionary measure but also to dicourage thoughts of resistance and to encourage surender." Perret.
  20. As an extension to the World War I Stoßdivisionen, all Infanterie-Regimenten now brough their own leght and heavy machine guns, as well as mortars and field artillery.
  21. Since tanks have very limited maneuvrebility inside urban confinements, it is an easy trap for infantry and anti-tank traps.
  22. These were usually the Sd.Kfz.251 and Sd.Kfz.250, which had 8 mm. thin armour sides, and were used both as armoured personel carriers and as communication vehicles and gun tractors. They were scarce throughout the war, so they were heavily supplemented with trucks and horse carriages.
  23. Most used were the 2 cm Flak, 3,7 cm Flak and 8,8 cm Flak, the latter of which was used intentionally by anti-tank sections since the Germans discovered its armour-piercing potential in the Spanish civil war. The Germans already then used the 40 mm. Bofors anti-aircraft gun (which the Allies used as well).
  24. The Ju87 "Stuka" had a whistle, which made an intimmidating shrieking noise when diving.
  25. "Each tank company consisted of three platoons of five tank each, plus two tanks for the company commander (so that he had a spare tank). The company comander's tanks were equipped with two-ways radios so that he could recieve orders and pas them on. Each platoon commander's tank had only a one-way radio; he could hear hiw orders but not reply. The other tanks in the platoon had no radios and had to depend on visual signaling from their platoon commander." Deighton, 2000.
  26. "Mechanized groups spearhead deeper into the enemy territory outflanking the enemy positions and paralyzing the rear preventing withdrawing troops and defenders from establishing effective defensive positions." <http://www.achtungpanzer.com/blitz.htm>.
  27. "Infantry and other support units attack enemy flanks in order to link up with other groups to complete the attack and eventually encircle the enemy." Ibid.
  28. Eastern Prussia - by all practical purposesa part of Germany - covered the entire Polish seafront, except for a small stretch of land, ending with the harbour city of Danzig (Gdansk).
  29. "But now Hitler did not want a Blumenkrieg. He wanted a real war and military victory in Poland, but he did not want France and Britain involved in the conflict. On the night of 28 August Hitler dreamed up a series of demands that he knew would sound reasonable to the Western Allies, but be unacceptable to the Poles. These would include giving the Poles just one day to get a plenepotentiary to Berlin. Either they would refuse to comply at such short notice or the negotiator would arrive and find agreement impossible. This would enable Hitler to start his attack on 1 September as planned.
    With intercepts of the British ambassador's telephone conversation to London in his hands, Hitler felt sure that this final device would be enough to sever the Poles from the West. At midday on 31 August he gave his army the provisional go-ahead. A few minutes later the Polish ambassador asked to see the German Foreign Minister. At 4 P.M. on that same day, 31 August 1939, with the Polish ambassador still waiting to speak to him, Hitler gave his army the final decision: the attack would begin the next morning." Deighton, 2000.
  30. "Every month the German army grew in size and strength. In 1934 the 100.000-man army had no tanks, no airplanes, and very little artillery, and Germany had been disarmed for fourteen years. But by 1939 Prime Minister Chamberlain was facing a Germany in process of mobilizing 4 milion men. Theoretically, in that four-year period, each of the 100.000 professional soldiers had trained forty men. In fact, not even the German Army could have done that, and only about one man i eight had even the brifest training before mobilization. The Ersatz and Landwehr divisions consisted mostly of middle-aged man who hardly remembered what a rifle looked like. The fact remain that Hitler now had the large army he wanted and was virtually in direct control of its operations." Deighton, 2000.
  31. Previously annexed by Germany
  32. "Polish politicians thought it possible that the Germans would simply sieze the free prot of Danzig and a large pjece of the Corridor and then stop fighting. Politically, such a success would have given the Poles the choice of letting the Germans keep what they had or carry on the war and facing charges that they were the agressors. It was for this reason that the Polish Commander in Chief was told to put a large army in the Corridor. It has been estimated that about a third of the whole Polish Army was there when German spearheads came from both sides and cut it to shreds." Deighton, 2000.
  33. "The Poznan army had been virtually by-passed by the original attack. To withdraw an army is a considerable feat of staff work and organization; to fight at the same time comes close to impossible. The fighting troops became intangeled with transport colums and field artillery, while coming the other way along the country roads is everything from wheelwright to the physical training inspector. In spite of all the problems, the Poznan army – with remnants of the survivors from the Corridor – turned southward and then attacked the German southern thrust with enough vigor to make its army commander call for help and force the whole German corps to swing its front northward and bring another regiment north by air." Ibid.
  34. "And what about the Russians? On the day the German pincers closed, news reached the OKW that units of the Red Army had crossed into Poland over its eastern frontier. "Against whom?" Jodl, the OKW Chief of Operations, asked in alarm. Hitler's secret agreement, to spilt Poland down the middle with the Russians, had been so well kept that even his commanders were surprised by it." Ibid.
  35. "The Poles [...] had a secret military pact. It had been made with the French only a few months before. It was agreed that in the event of a German attack on Poland, France would, on the third day after mobilization, launch limited attacks, following this with a full-scale land offensive using the bulk of her available forces not before the fifteenth day after mobilization." Ibid.
  36. "[...] France at this time was not strong enough to launch a major assault. At the Nuremberg trials, General Jodl said that he had been surprised the Allies did not use their 110 British and French divisions to attack the 25 divisions that the Germans had facing west.
    The Swiss historian Eddy Bauer has pointed out, however, that Germany had 34 divisions facing west at the time of the attack on Poland, with the total brought up to over 43 by 10 September. He also shows that Allied strength was far less than 110 divisions. No British troops were in position until October. France also had to cover the Italian and Spanish frontiers and had 14 divisions in North Africa. Bauer calculates that at the time of the declaration of war France had only 7 divisions available for the Western Front. Even on 20 September, with mobiiazation completed, there were only 57 divisions (and this number includes the men manning the Maginot Line fortifications)." Ibid.
  37. "The nature of the Polish Army, too, made a German victory inevitable. Emotially wedded to the great achivements of the War of 1920, when well-led cavalry had seen off Tukhachevsky's ill-organized Bolshevik hordes, the Poles had made a slow progress towards mechanization. On 1 September 1939, the day of the German invasion, they could field just over 700 tanks, although of these some 450 were TK/TKS-type tankettes and little better than tracked machine-gun carriages, fifty-five were World War I RenaultFTs and fifty were more recent Renault R.35s which offered a slight improvement; the remainder were variations of the Vickers six-ton (6,500 km [stavefejl - kg]) theme, the most numerous type being the 7-TP, which was armed with a 37mm gun. Most of the Polish armour was allocated in company or battalion strength to higher formations, but one all-arms mechanized formation, the 10th Cavalry Brigade, had been set up in 1039 with offensive operations in mind. The principal strength of the army lay in its thirty infantry divisions, adequately equipped with field and anti-tank artillery and numerous anti-tank rifles, and in its eleven mounted cavalry brigades. This loyalty to the horse was not entirely sentimental, for it alone conferred complete mobility in a landscape of forest, streams flowing through low-lying marshland and the sandy roads known locally as trakts. Much the same conditions prevailed in large areas of eastern Germany; hence the continued use of horse-drawn transport and artillery in the German Army. What neither side could be quite certain of in 1939 was the extent to which such terrain would inhibit the movement of large mechanized formations, and both were, to a certain extent, gambling." Perret.
  38. "After the First World War, the French Army remembered the elaborate underground shelters from which the Germans had emerged to decimate the Allied attacks." Deighton, 2000.
  39. "Everyone who looks at the map of the Line [Maginotlinien] asks why it did not continue west al the way to the sea, especially since this flat area of the northwest had always been the route of the invader. Here France had fought for her life since the Romans and the Franks. Spanish armies from the Low Countries, Marlborough, Prince Eugene, Wallington after Waterloo, and, in 1914, the Kaiser's armies had all come this way. And Paris was a tempting short march from this frontier.
    So why was it not heavily fortified? Certainly this lowland region would have required special engineering, and any deep fortifications would have had to be constantly pumped to keep them habitable. But the diciding objection was the closeness of French industry to the border. The Maginot Line could not run north of the French industrial region without crossing the Belgian frontier; it could only go through the industrial region or pass south of it. In the case of war, and particularly in the case of the 1914-1918 style of war the French envisaged, the alternative seemed to be having the industries pounded to pjeces in the fighting or abandoning them to the enemy before the fighting started." Ibid.
  40. Far from predicting the German armoured thrust through the Ardennes, Lidell Hart specifically said in 1939 in his book The Defence of Britain that a large-scale movement through the Ardennes was not possible because of the terrain" Ibid.
  41. "The German Fourth Army occupied Luxembourg before the coordinated attack. This plan can be likened to a door, hinged on Luxembourg and swinging through Belgium and northern France. The original plan was for a larger door which could slam down on Paris, but in the event it was modified. Thus the exposed flank of the German First Army became vulnerable to a counterattack from Paris. A vital weakness of this operation was the German failure to supply its fast-moving armies" Ibid.
  42. "Superficially resembling the 1914 attack, this plan lacked its boldness. Even the generals who evolved this plan hoped for no more than a clash of armies that would push the Allies back as far as the Somme." Ibid.
  43. "It was clear to him [von Manstein], and to many other senior officers, that Plan Yellow as written contained an inherrent flaw that would inhibit its success from the outset. Like the Schilffen Plan, it required a strong right wing [den nordlige del af angrebet], and for that reason all the armour was concentrated under von Bock in Army Group B [Armeegruppe Nord]. This meant that it would effectively be denied its greatest asset, its mobility, because it was being forced to operate in landscapes of rivers, streams and canals. On the other hand, thought Manstein, Plan Yellow could be used as a matador's cloak to lure the British and French armies north into the Low Countries. This was nothing less than Fuller's Phase II of Plan 1919, and as soon as the Allies were firmly inside the trap, Manstein's intention was that Army Group A would execute a rapid panzer-led deep penetration through the Ardennes and across the good tank country of northern France to the Somme estuary. The enemy armies inside the pocket thus formed would then be destroyed in the traditional battle of annihilation. The only doubt was whether the rolling, heavily forested hills of the Ardennes were really as tank-proof as the French believed. Guderian was asked for his opinion and he said they were not." Perret.
  44. Quite a feat, considering that the Belgian garrison was 800 man large, and the German force a mere 80.
  45. "[...] the Meuse advance had gone less smothly than he had hoped, not because of enemy action, but simply because of ttraffic jams. His [Guderians]1.PzPiv and 10.PzDiv were already at the river, but 2.Pz.Div was delayed. This was one of the best-equipped divisions, as well as having with it an extra battalion of artillery which would be sorely needed for the attack.
    Guderian, shaken no doubt by a narrow escape when a bomb hit his headquarters in the Hotel Panorama on the heights above Bouillon, now showed a most uncaracteristic failure of nerve. He decided to wait until his whole armoured corps had arrived at the Meuse. Ironically it was Kleist – the man who had been appointed paner group commander to limit Guderians impetuosity, who now ordered that the attack should go ahead with all possible speed, in site of the absence of the 2.Pz.Div and its extra artillery[...]" Deighton, 2000.
  46. "The rationing of shells remained in force, for the French commander still believed that the assault could not take place for several days as the Germans would need to concentrate more artillery [...] but only shortly did they realize that the bombing plane was to be its substitute." Ibid.
  47. "As dawn broke, some tanks had already crossed, but without lights it was slow work and the tanks could not be sent south one by one." Ibid.
  48. "While an alternative supply route was being set up, Gort organized the sort of counterattack that the German commenders most feared: a thrust southward to sever the strung-out German advance. [...] If the German force was representative of the best of the German Army of that time, the Allied force was a demonstration of the Anglo-French weaknesses. The infantry arrived late at their allotted positions. Artillery support was also delayed. Because of inadequate netting and bad atmospherics, there were no proper radio contact between units. The promised air support did not arrive. [...] At 2:30 P.M. on 21 May, having given up all hope that the two promised French infantry divisions would ever arrive, the mixed British force began moving south in two colums on road about 3 miles apart. The British tank component consisted of sixteen Mk. II Matildas with 2-pounder guns and fifty-eight Mk. Is armed only with maschine guns.
    By coincidence, the Germans had chosen 3P.M. to move forward, one panzer division each side of Arras. [...] One British Matilda had fourteen gouges made by shells that failed to penetrate the steel. [...] The failure of German antitank guns made it necassery for the German tanks to engage British armour, something usually avoided. In the fighting that began about 7 P.M. the Germans lost six of their PzKw IIIs and three of the PzKw Ivs, as well as some PzKw IIs. The British lost even Mk. Is. It was at this point of the battle when infantry of SS-Totenkopf Division saw their tanks knocked out and burning. It was a shock. The SS paniked and withdrew quickly.
    French Suoma tank crews also saw the burning German tanks and were equally surprised. Uable to believe that at long last the Germans were suffering setbacks, the French crews concluded that the antitank guns were German and so opened fire on them. British gunners responded to what they thouoght was another flank attack and knocked out four of the French Suoma tanks before the tragic error was discovered.
    Convinced that hundreds of tanks were attacking, Rommel took personal command of his guns. He hurried from batery to battery giving them targets and urging them to faster action. When the antitank guns failed, he brought into play the guns of his artillery regiment, but it was the 8.8 cm anti-aircraft guns that finally penetrated the heavy British tank armour. The Allied counterattack was halted by the versatility the German arms and their coordination effected by the personal energy of the divisional commander." Ibid.
  49. This can, however, be proved wrong by the fact that Hitler had already said the BEF should be destroyed. "It is difficult to believe that Hitler had evolved any strategic reason for spearing the BEF. As recently as 24 May, Hitler's directive No. 13 had begun to be put into effect. "The next goal of operations is the annihilation of the French, British and Belgian forces…During this operation the task of the Luftwaffe is to break all enemy resistance in the encircled parts and to prevent the escape of the British forces across the Channel" Ibid.
  50. "Hitler did not underestimate the difficulties[ved at erobre England], but in the absence of any other means of coercing Britain he was compelled to turn to invasion. Accordingly on July 16th [1940] he issued 'War Directive No. 16,' which said (inter alia):
    As England in spite of her hopeless military position has so far shown herself unwilling to come to any compromise, I have decided to begin preparations for and, if necessary, to carry out the invasion of England.
    This operation is dictated by the necessity of eliminating Great Britain as a base from which the was against Germany can be fought. If necessary, the island will be occupied...
    I therefore issue the following orders:
    1.       The landing operation must be a surprise crossing on a broad front extending approximately from Ramsgate to a point west of the Isle of Wright…The preparations…must be concluded by the middle of August.
    2.       The following preparations must be undertaken to make a landing in England possible:
            (a) The English Air Force must be eliminated to such an extent that it will be incapable of putting up any substantial opposition to the invading forces.
            (b) The sea routes must be cleared of mines.
            (c) Both flanks, the Straits of Dover and the Western approaches to the Channel…must be so heavily mined as to be completely inaccessible.
            (d) Heavy coastal guns must dominate and protect the entire costal front area…
    3.       The invasion will be referred to by the code-name of 'Sealion' [Seelöwe]" Wilmot.
  51. "How little the German Army understood the problem of cross-Channelinvasion is apparent from the first detailed reference to it in Halder's diary. "Method," he wrote on July 3rd, "similar to large-scale river crossing"[...]" Ibid.
  52. "The halt order was originally a sensible precaution [...] Only after the BEF had been "miraculously" rescued by sea was the Halt debated." Deighton, 2000.

Sources

  1. DEIGHTON, Len. Blitzkrieg - From the rise of Hitler to the fall of Dunkirk. Edison (NJ) : Castle Books, 2000.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk] [Buy now at Amazon.com]
  2. PERRET, Bryan. Knights of the black cross. Hertfordshire : Wordsworth Editions, 1997.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk]
  3. KERSHAW, Andrew (editor). Tanks at war 1939-1945. London : Phoebus Publishing Company, 1975.
  4. CULVER, Bruce. Panzer Colors II - Markings for the German panzer forces 1939-45. Carrollton (TX) : Squadron/Signal Publications, 1984.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk]
  5. CHAMBERLAIN, Peter, DOYLE, Hilary & JENTZ, Thomas L. ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GERMAN TANKS OF WORLD WAR TWO. London : Arms & Armour, 2000.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk] [Buy now at Amazon.com]
  6. LUCAS, James. German army handbook 1939-1945. London : Chancellor Press, 2000.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk] [Buy now at Amazon.com]
  7. DEIGHTON, Len. Blood, tears and folly - An objective look at World War II. Edison, NJ : Castle Books, 1999.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk] [Buy now at Amazon.com]
  8. WILMOT, Chester. The struggle for Europe. Hertfordshire : Wordsworth Editions, 1997.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk] [Buy now at Amazon.com]
  9. THOMAS, Nigel & ANDREW, Stephen. Men-At-Arms 311 - The German army 1939-45 (1) - Blitzkrieg. Oxford : Osprey Publishing, 1999.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk] [Buy now at Amazon.com]
  10. SHEPPERD, Alan. Campaign 3 - France 1940 - Blitzkrieg in the west. Oxford : Osprey Publishing, 1990.
    [Buy now at Amazon.co.uk] [Buy now at Amazon.com]
  11. Osprey Military Journal, vol.2 issue 3. Oxford : Osprey Publishing, 2000.
  12. PARADA, George. Achtung - Panzer ! The Concept of Blitzkrieg [online]. [Cited 2002-05]. Available from Internet: <http://www.achtungpanzer.com/blitz.htm>.
  13. TRUEMAN, C. History learning site. Blitzkrieg [online]. [Cited 2002-05]. Available from Internet: <http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/blitzkrieg.htm>.

All contents written by Christian Ankerstjerne unless stated otherwise